|

127 White Oak Lane
Old Bridge, New Jersey
1-888-759-3000
![[ the school ]](images/school.gif)
![[ the faculty ]](images/faculty.GIF)

![[ about bmsi ]](images/about.GIF)
![[ info links ]](images/info.GIF)
![[ reach us ]](images/reach.GIF)
![[ news ]](images/newsnav2.GIF)
![[ news library ]](images/librarynav.GIF)
![[ events ]](images/events.GIF)

![[ home ]](images/home.GIF)
[ Email Direct
]
|
|
![[ case studies ]](images/t_studies.gif)
Surgery: Bilateral Nephrectomy, umbilical herniorrhapy,
and incidental appendectomy
"Case
studies highlight the variety of methods utilized in the Bloodless
field. We will feature studies done at St. Vincent Charity Hospital,
as well as, studies submitted by physicians across the United
States. Do you have an interesting case? Please contact BMSI for publication information."
Irene Kopen, RN
CBMS
St. Vincent Charity
Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
[Recommend you print this
document and read offline]
F.S. a 46 year old
male presenting with bilateral polycystic kidney disease, self
referred to the Center for Bloodless Medicine and Surgery (CBMS)
at St. Vincent Charity Hospital for bilateral nephrectomy. Mr.
F.S. had been diagnosed, evaluated, and accepted into the kidney
transplant program at hospital A. He was then accepted for surgical
removal of his polycystic kidneys. A two stage operation was
recommended for this bilateral removal of the diseased kidneys.
It was decided by the surgical team at hospital A that Mr. F.S.
undergo surgery of the largest kidney first, and after sufficient
recovery periods, the second non-functioning kidney would be
removed. This two-stage operative plan, would entail two surgical
interventions, along with the required hospitalization and recovery
time. Mr. F.S. requested this operation to be a one time intervention
with both kidneys being removed, sparing him of having to undergo
two separate surgical experiences with the resultant double expenses
and work time lost due to double recovery periods. Since Mr.
F.S. was a Jehovah's Witness, he also requested this surgery
be done without the use of homologous blood transfusions.
After evaluating the
risk factors of this one-stage intervention without the use of
blood backup, the surgical team at hospital A recommended that
Mr. F.S. have his surgery outside the Cleveland area where another
opinion may be sought. They felt, however, that most second opinions
would support hospital A's decision. It was after this episode
that F.S. contacted the Center for Bloodless Medicine and Surgery
(CBMS) at St. Vincent Charity Hospital in Cleveland Ohio for
his second opinion.
On admission into the
CBMS Department at St. Vincent charity Hospital, F.S. pre-surgery
examination revealed bilateral abdominal masses and an umbilical
hernia. Multiple x-rays including renal arteriograms, CT scans,
and ultrasounds showed massively enlarged polycystic kidneys
and multiple cysts in the liver.
His past history included
neck and back skin cancer removed, cardiac cauterization following
myocardial infarct in 1987, right bundle branch block, bi-lateral
rotator cuff tear (non-repaired), hypertension, secondary to
kidney disease and peptic ulcers. His medication included: Zestril,
Cadura, Minoxidil, zinc, betacarotene and Vit. A. He was dosed
with erythropoietin 2500u 3x/ week beginning in August, 1997
when he was started on hemodialysis. Two weeks prior to surgery,
F.S. was dosed with Procrit 30,000u 3 x/week with IV iron loading
dose the first day of his procrit regimen. Renal dialysis was
ordered 3 consecutive days before surgery.
Surgery performed: Bilateral
Nephrectomy, umbilical herniorrhapy, and incidental appendectomy.
With the patient under
general anesthesia, a chevron incision was made, and the surgical
team began removal of the right kidney while sparing the right
adrenal gland. Homeostasis was achieved with electrocautery,
clamping, and ligatures. The left kidney was then removed in
the same fashion, the left adrenal gland, not being identified
with certainty. These massive kidneys made for a difficult dissection,
while the spleen was avoided. Oozing was controlled with clamping
and blood loss was 400cc, with cell saver replacement of approximately
80cc. The patient received1400cc crystalloid and 500 cc albumisol
over a period of 2 hours. The entire surgery lasted 2hr/55min.
His post operative course was uneventful, although slightly prolonged
because of CRF and his need for dialysis. His presurgical Hgb
was 13.3, and Hct was 40. Immediate post operative Hgb was 12.8/Hct38.8
dropping to 10.8/Hct32 , rebounding with epo dosing to 12.0/Hct35
on the day of discharge. His BP ranged from 140/80 on the day
of surgery to 170/90. This was controlled with Lotensin 20mg.
qd. His uremia was satisfactorily controlled, although Bun/Creat.
ranged between 47/10 to 69/14. K levels were kept in the range
of 4,0--5.0.
He was discharged 10
days post op. and in good condition with a good prognosis. He
is on a transplant protocol. His nutrition is maintained with
his normal renal diet and he was put on limited activity. Hemodialysis
regimen was established at a local dialysis center.
Pathology
Report:
The #1 specimen consists
of a polycystic right kidney measuring 30cm. X 16cm. x 12cm.
and weighing 2,430 gms. The adrenal gland is not identified.
Serial sections through the kidney reveal variably sized cysts
and markedly dilated calceal systems. Small islands of medium
tan to reddish tissue are noted between the cyst wall. The #2
specimen consists of the left polycystic kidney, measuring 28.cm
x16cm. x12cm. weighing 2,635 gms. with similar gross characteristics
as described in #1. The adrenal gland is not identified. Microscopic
exam shows multiple sections of kidney demonstrating variable
sized cysts lined by flattened and cuboidal epithelium. Other
cysts show organizing hemorrhage with erosion of the surface
epithelium and chronic inflammation with multinucleated giant
cell reactions indicative of acute and diffuse chronic pylonephritis,
atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Microcalcification is also
present.
Discussion:
Coming from a small
rural area 90 miles from a major industrial center with a variety
of healthcare facilities should have been a one visit endeavor
to find appropriate care for this seriously ill patient. However,
this patient found himself being turned down because he requested
surgery without the risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusions.
Under standard protocol, this patient would have had to extend
his hospital experience and expenses to double the extraordinary
costs (including time lost from work and earning capabilities)
incurred from two separate difficult surgeries and rehabilitative
courses involved in recovery. Because he had the fortitude to
pursue his choices, he could be referred to a hospital and surgical
team that were confident and practiced in the "bloodless"
approach to medical and surgical management. The uniqueness of
a coordinated hospitalwide "bloodless" specialty can
only be successful with the support and input from all players
in this approach to healthcare. Blood conservation techniques
and protocol are of prime importance as well as the use of technology
and trained professionals. Both of these massive kidneys were
removed along with the hernia repair and appendectomy with one
major surgical intervention using these technologies and skills
of the team organized to perform this high-risk surgery. Because
of this patient's exercise of his rights of choice for bodily
integrity, he was able to maintain a measure of control over
this serious disease with a peace of mind and comfort knowing
his wishes would be met within the protocol of a well coordinated,
dedicated and accredited "bloodless medicine and surgery"
program. Managed care entities would benefit as well as the patient
and families by taking advantage of these well-run facilities.
[Top of page]
Copyright
(C) 1998-2008 by: Bloodless Medicine & Surgery Institute.
All rights reserved.
|